|
Edward Freer Hills (1912–1981) was an American Presbyterian scholar, perhaps the greatest 20th Century Traditional (“Byzantine”) Text, and Received Text defender.〔One Bible only?: examining exclusive claims for the King James Bible Roy E. Beacham, Kevin T. Bauder p48 - 2001 "Edward F. Hills - Another individual who made a sizable contribution to the KingJames-Only movement, although not drawing directly from the works of Wilkinson and Ray, is Edward F. Hills (1912-1981). Hills actually possessed genuine ..."〕〔James D. Price (who isn't a KJO proponent) alludes to this in: (''King James Onlyism: A New Sect'', 2006 pg. 263 )〕 Dr. Hills integrates his theological perspective alongside New Testament criticism. Reading Dean John William Burgon inspired Dr. Hills to approach textual criticism from a “logic of faith” (1952 is the year that Dr. Hills made a definite commitment to this view).〔This statement can be seen in the 2nd to last paragraph of ( The Testimony of Dr. Edward F. Hills ) by David Cloud〕 As to the relationship of the King James Bible to the Received Text, Hills wrote "the King James Version ought to be regarded not merely as a translation of the Textus Receptus but also as an independent variety of the Textus Receptus." ((King James Version Defended, Ch. 8) ) ==Education== *Graduated summa cum laude at Yale University (1930–1933)〔check out the Robert Barnett's contribution at http://www.deanburgonsociety.org/KJBible/barnett91.htm.〕〔I am assuming since Dr. Hills mentioned that he was a sophomore at Yale in 1931, that would mean his years of study at Yale would most likely be around 1930-33.〕 *Th.D. from Westminster Theological Seminary (ca. 1935) *Th.M. from Columbia Theological Seminary *Th.D. in New Testament textual criticism from Harvard under the supervision of Henry J. Cadbury, Kirsopp Lake as one of the readers〔(''Hills Revisited '' ) by John Whitmer〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Edward F. Hills」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|